Discover
We check the website, entities, content, external sources, Brand Mentions and how AI systems currently interpret the brand.
OUTPUTStarting pointWe connect website analysis, entities, content, external sources, Brand Mentions and AI answers in one decision process.
The methodology is designed to answer one question: what is limiting the brand now, and what should we do next?
Not every project needs every action. Every project needs the right order of decisions.
The process stays consistent even when the scope changes. We first understand the starting point, then decide which layer needs work.
We check the website, entities, content, external sources, Brand Mentions and how AI systems currently interpret the brand.
OUTPUTStarting pointWe organise information, entities, naming, relationships, content architecture and technical signals.
OUTPUTBrand understandingWe build the external context and independent sources that help confirm the brand beyond its own website.
OUTPUTExternal confirmationWe compare the new state with the baseline and decide what improved, what remains weak and what should happen next.
OUTPUTNext decisionBefore we recommend content, technical work, Brand Mentions or SEO, we identify which part of the system is actually limiting visibility.
Can search and AI systems access, crawl and interpret the site?
Are the offer, entities, topics and relationships clear enough?
Does the site answer the questions and intents that define the market?
Do independent sources support the same brand picture?
How is the brand currently described, compared, cited or omitted?
Do we have a baseline that lets us see whether anything improved?
This matters because an audit becomes unreliable when measured signals and expert interpretation are presented as if they were the same thing.
Things that can be checked directly: accessibility, structure, page relationships, markup, source presence and factual consistency.
Things that can be measured or repeatedly observed: mentions, recurrence, AI answers, source patterns and changes over time.
Our conclusion about what the combined evidence means for the brand and which action deserves priority.
AI Search works on the information systems use to understand the brand. Brand Mentions work on the independent context that helps confirm that understanding.
Entities · structure · content · intent
Sources · context · reputation · recurrence
What is actually limiting the brand?
What evidence supports that diagnosis?
What is the smallest useful intervention?
How will we know whether the action helped?
Measurement should explain what changed and why the next action is justified.
Current website, source, mention and AI-answer state.
Technical, semantic, content or external-source work.
Visibility, context, consistency, recurrence and answer patterns.
The next action follows from the new evidence.
FunkyMEDIA uses its own research, source analysis and long-term datasets to test assumptions about AI Search and Brand Mentions.
See FunkyMEDIA research →A useful methodology also needs clear limits.
AI platforms and search systems do not expose one complete deterministic formula.
Improving signals does not guarantee that any specific AI system will recommend a brand.
We do not present uncertain interpretation as exact measurement.
The scope depends on the brand, market, current signals and commercial goals.